North Yorkshire Council
Executive
Minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday, 16 December 2025 commencing at 11.00 am.
Councillor Carl Les in the Chair. Councillors Mark Crane, Gareth Dadd, Michael Harrison, Simon Myers, Heather Phillips, Janet Sanderson, Malcolm Taylor and Annabel Wilkinson.
Remote attendance: Councillor Richard Foster (from Minute 806)
In attendance: Councillors Paul Haslam (R), Yvonne Peacock (R),Tom Seston and David Webster.
Officers present: Richard Flinton, Gary Fielding, Pete Thorpe, Barry Khan, Michael Leah, Andrew Rowe, Louise Wallace, Daniel Harry, Elizabeth Jackson, Nic Harne (R), Shaun Berry (R), Philip Cowan (R), Kathryn Daly (R), Imogen Downie (R), Amanda Fielding, Jon Holden, Marie-Ann Jackson, Lizzie Phippard (R), Chris Reynolds (R), Tracy Rathmell (R), Dean Richardson (R), Adele Wilson-Hope (R),
|
Copies of all documents considered are in the Minute Book
|
|
798 |
Apologies for Absence
There were no apologies for absence. It was noted that Councillor Richard Foster would be attending the meeting remotely and would not be able to take part in the votes.
|
|
799 |
Minutes of the Meeting held on 18 November 2025
Resolved
That the public Minutes of the meeting held on 18 November 2025, having been printed and circulated, be taken as read and confirmed by the Chair as a correct record.
|
|
800 |
Declarations of Interest
Councillor Mark Crane declared an interest in Minute 812 on the basis that he was a Member of Selby and Ainsty Area Planning Committee and left the meeting during consideration of the item.
|
|
801 |
Exclusion of the Public
Resolved
That on the grounds that it involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006, the public was excluded from the meeting during consideration of:
1) Minute 812 – Variation of Restrictive Covenant – Land at Sherburn in Elmet
2) Minute 813 – Acquisition of Properties in Various Localities for use as affordable homes to go into the Housing Revenue Account.
|
|
802 |
Public Questions and Statements
There were three public questions and statements:
1. Public Question from Andy Jefferson, Whitby resident – in relation to Minute 803 – Director of Public Health Annual Report 2025
Whitby has many areas with high indices of multiple deprivation, as highlighted in the 2025 data. It also has some of the lowest levels of cycling infrastructure in the county along with the lowest uptake in cycling, as well as poor quality walking/wheeling infrastructure, with investment in active travel schemes non-existent.
Additionally it is well below minimum standard in terms of green space availability and accessibility, with much used areas being sold off (for housing), contrary to the wishes of local residents, on a regular basis.
Many organisations (and indeed also the Director of Public Health) have highlighted the demonstrable positive link between health / well-being and active travel, as well as access to local green space.
The Director of Public Health’s 2025 report emphasises the statutory duty of the local authority to improve the health and well-being of its residents. It also highlights a few areas where Public Health may be influencing the decision making process in the council.
WHAT influence does Public Health data, such as indices of multiple deprivation, have on
a). decisions around Active Travel schemes selected for funding? b). decisions around selling off of green space?
and if there is no influence currently, WHEN is North Yorkshire Council going to utilise such data for such decisions (as part of its duty to improve public health)?
Response from the Executive Member for Health and Adult Services
Whilst I agree with some of the points made in the question, I don’t accept everything that is stated in it. The question says Whitby has some of the lowest levels of cycling infrastructure in the county along with the lowest uptake in cycling, as well as poor quality walking/wheeling infrastructure, with investment in active travel schemes non-existent, and that it is well below minimum standard in terms of green space availability and accessibility. I don’t accept this.
Public health data is regularly used, in combination with other sources of information, to support decision-making in a variety of areas across the council. This includes decisions relating to active travel and green space. For instance, the council has developed a total of ten Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs) for the main towns across North Yorkshire over the last few years. There is a ‘long list’ of potential active travel schemes based on the corridors from all these ten LCWIPs across the county, including the Whitby LCWIP, as well as other schemes in other areas.
When a funding opportunity arrives, we assess all schemes against the funding criteria. For example, the Department for Transport’s Active Travel Fund Tranche 4 (ATF4) criteria included ‘targeting areas with poor health outcomes and with high levels of deprivation’, so public health data, the index of multiple deprivation, is an integral part of the decision making process to prioritise schemes.
In summary, public health does play a part in scheme sifting for bids, but to what degree is dependent on the funding criteria and the type of schemes the fund is available for.
Specifically relating to green space, the council considers a wide range of factors when deciding whether to dispose of its landholdings, including current use, potential future opportunities and the outcomes that could be achieved from each site.
Whilst it is recognised that green space can contribute significantly to improved health and wellbeing, the level of impact depends on various factors, so sites are assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Where land is classified as public open space or amenity land, the council has a statutory obligation to advertise the proposed disposal and consider any objections before proceeding. These requirements allow community users or beneficiaries to have a voice in decisions that might affect future access to green space.
2. Public Question from Roger Tuckett, founder and CEO of Yorkshire Adult Autism Self-Advocacy Group (YAAAG)
At the launch of the North Yorkshire Autism Strategy in March 2025, a programme of action and collaborative activity with the NY Autism Community as promised for its first year. Sadly, relatively little progress has been made compared to North Yorkshire’s immediate neighbour.
The City of York is making major strides forward with its strategy, embracing co-production and codesign at its core and seeing the enhancement of Autism services and support in the city (including funding), advancing far ahead of any dreams of such progress in North Yorkshire.
Frustratingly, the Integrated Care Board continued to embarked on a period of evasion and secrecy about its plans and ideas and its refusal to fund the Autism Assessment Pathways in accordance with patient need and statutory guidance. No updates were ever provided to the NY Autism Community of Interest. Relevant internal ICB briefing were initially available under FOI Requests, but belatedly, disclosure was refused on spurious technical grounds and non-clinicians denied access to discussion workshops contrary to past ICB Collaborative Partnership practice.
Nationally, there have been two important Reviews: In early November, a House of Lords Select Committee on Autism produces a comprehensive Report and in early December, the Government launched an Independent Inquiry into the prevalence of Autism, ADHD and mental health and the level of unmet need for support and care.
Three consistent themes emerge across all of these, including the York & NY Autism Strategies themselves: (a) It is essential to work together in close partnership with Autistic people, their carers and families; (b) system level problems and obstacles are regularly implicated which require system level consensus and solutions to resolve; and (c) lifetime outcomes for Autistic people remain as bad as ever, with considerable health inequalities and unmet need. Much still remains to be done. Above all, Autism is not an illness but a lifelong neurological condition.
The Council has with others established a NY Mental Health and Autism Partnership Board, but this is an officer working group with no direct lived experience or third sector involvement other than through Healthwatch. Its membership and Terms of Reference remain unknown. An Autism Partnership Board is typically described as “a local, collaborative group bringing together autistic people, families/carers, and professionals from health, social care, and voluntary sectors to improve services, plan strategies, and ensure the voice of autistic individuals is heard in local decision-making, focusing on rights, inclusion, and better outcomes.”
Accordingly, will this Council: 1. Support and participate in a 2026 Leadership Summit for Autism and ADHD across York and North Yorkshire. It is hoped David Skaith might agree to lead and facilitate such an event. York has already shown strong support for this approach.
2. Establish immediately a separate Autism Partnership Board for North Yorkshire as such a body is generally understood to be constituted.
3. Appoint immediately a named individual as lead within the Council for the provision and commissioning of all Autism-related support, who will be answerable to such a Board.
Note: The second and third of these are already mandated by 2015 Statutory Guidance (paras 3.19, 4.1, 4.2, 4.24) and are also specifically emphasised in the recent House of Lords Report (paras 12, 113, 149).
Response from the Executive Member for Health and Adult Services
Question 1: Support and participate in a 2026 Leadership Summit for Autism and ADHD across York and North Yorkshire. It is hoped David Skaith might agree to lead and facilitate such an event. York has already shown strong support for this approach.
Answer: We would be willing to talk with partners and the community of interest group including autistic people’s networks about exploring this for the new year, however our priority is on practical delivery of our agreed actions (for example, we are expanding supported employment services and planning new supported housing options)
Question 2: Establish immediately a separate Autism Partnership Board for North Yorkshire as such a body is generally understood to be constituted.
Answer: We are not proposing to establish a separate board at this time but there are separate networks and meetings related to the strategy including the autism community or interest group and the Mental Health, PLD and Neuro-diversity Partnership Board attended by Healthwatch as a representative of community voice networks.
Question 3: Appoint immediately a named individual as lead within the Council for the provision and commissioning of all Autism-related support, who will be answerable to such a Board.
Answer: Within North Yorkshire Council we do have officers with responsibility for commissioning of care and support services for autism. From January 2026 Gavin Swankie will be the operational senior lead for under 75s, including autistic people and Natalie Smith continues to be the lead for commissioning and strategy
3. Public Statement from Jim Bullock, Phoenix Community Park Community Interest Organisation – in relation to Minute 811 – Eastfield: Former Overdale School Site and Middle Deepdale Capital Receipts Funding
Dear Councillors
I am speaking on behalf of the Phoenix Community Park CIO, a registered charity established to deliver a new Town Park at the heart of Eastfield. Although our charitable status was confirmed only recently, the project has been under active development for more than three years.
The need for a wheeled sports facility is highlighted within the Scarborough South Plan. A full feasibility study and detailed designs have been completed in close collaboration with officers from North Yorkshire Council. The project is now ready to progress to the planning and construction stages, subject to confirmation of funding and our business plan supporting the asset transfer will be submitted shortly.
Phoenix Park enjoys strong and broad community support. Local schools, the police, and voluntary organisations have all endorsed the scheme, recognising its potential to reduce antisocial behaviour, strengthen community links between old and new
Eastfield, and provide a shared space for engagement and recreation. Public consultations have shown overwhelming approval for the proposals. Eastfield faces significant social and economic challenges. The town currently lacks basic amenities such as a GP service, café, dentist, or public house, and offers few opportunities for leisure or further education—particularly for young people. With a population already exceeding 7,000 and forecast to rise beyond 10,000, the absence of shared public spaces is contributing to social division. Phoenix Community Park presents a unique opportunity to address these inequalities, improve wellbeing, and foster community pride.
Demolition of the site has recently been completed and given the project’s readiness and strategic importance, we respectfully request that it be designated a priority element within Eastfield’s regeneration programme. The recent decision to demolish the nursery building planned to be a cafe/ community rooms has increased the capital cost. The Align estimate of £1.57m would increase to a little under £2m with rebuild costs. This would still leave significant funds available for other projects within the town. If commenced promptly this would provide a very visible early benefit and sustain local enthusiasm. Early approval would also enhance our ability to retain trustees, attract partners, and secure additional external investment.
Phoenix Community Park represents far more than a local amenity—it is a cornerstone for regeneration, inclusion, and civic pride in Eastfield. We therefore urge the Council to approve the necessary funding to enable it to begin without delay.
Response from the Executive Member for Corporate Services
Thank you for attending and presenting your statement. I hold a different perspective on some points. While Mr Bullock stated that Eastfield lacked shared public spaces, I do not share that view. Eastfield has excellent open spaces and the available funding should be used to make the best possible use of those spaces.
There might be other areas where a skate park could be more appropriate, given local concerns about proximity to housing, and we need to work with the local Member, Councillor Seston, and the Town Council to ensure that funds are allocated equitably across all age groups in Eastfield.
There has been a long period of inactivity and missed opportunities to progress the project more swiftly in recent years and we now need to look to the future. The efforts of the Residents’ Association are recognised.
North Yorkshire Council has now reached the right conclusion, and everyone involved must have the information and skills to move forward. Community First Yorkshire was supporting local organisations to develop the project, who should work together to deliver results. It would be important to engage with stakeholders beyond the immediate group, including the proactive local boxing club, which could play a key role in driving progress. The project should address inequalities across all age groups in Eastfield and promote leisure and well-being.
The Executive Member praised the efforts made so far and encouraged continued collaboration. Eastfield was one of the most deprived areas in North Yorkshire and this funding represented a rare opportunity. She urged that the money be used wisely and effectively to deliver improvements for the community.
Mr Bullock responded with a supplementary, acknowledging that while other open spaces existed in Eastfield, most were designed for very young children and did not attract older age groups. He added that the main sports ground was waterlogged and difficult to use for football, which was its intended purpose. Over £3 million was available and the suggested phase one of the planned project could be delivered for approximately £2 million, leaving substantial funds for the boxing club and other local initiatives.
|
|
803 |
Director of Public Health Annual Report 2025
Considered – A report of the Director of Public Health presenting the Director of Public Health (the DPH) Annual Report 2024-2024: ‘Working Together for Yorkshire’.
The Executive Member for Health and Adult Services, Councillor Michael Harrison, welcomed the report and reminded Members that the report was an independent report, which the Council had a statutory duty to publish. Andy Jefferson submitted a public question which was read out at the meeting and a response provided by Councillor Harrison, as detailed at Minute 802.
The Director of Public Health, Louise Wallace, outlined that this was her fifth annual report, which this year focussed on the work of the council and partnership working across portfolios and sectors, and made the following key points:
· Opportunities had been maximised to improve and protect the health of the population, not only through the Public Health team but also via wider partnerships across all service areas. · Emphasis was placed on the importance of partnerships beyond the Council, acknowledging the contribution of statutory partners, community groups and the voluntary sector in achieving shared public health outcomes. · The voice of local communities had been incorporated alongside quantitative data to inform priorities and actions. · A voluntary peer review exercise had been undertaken earlier in the year, facilitated by the Association of Directors of Public Health, which provided valuable feedback to support continuous improvement. · The report included updates on previous recommendations, notably in relation to healthy ageing, and set out new recommendations for collaborative working across North Yorkshire.
Members welcomed the accessible read and cross-disciplinary working evidenced in leisure, housing, libraries, and planning, and the Executive Member for Children and Families welcomed the partnership work with Children’s Services and the positive impacts of a number of initiatives.
Resolved (unanimously)
1) That the content of the Director of Public Health Annual Report 2024-2025 be noted
2) Consideration be given to the recommendations made within the report and how these relate to the whole local authority.
Reasons for recommendations
The recommendations were made on the basis that the report provided a valuable overview of the benefits of partnership working to reduce health inequalities for the population of North Yorkshire, and that publication of the report would meet the local authority’s legal duties to so publish.
Alternative options considered
No alternative options had been considered, for the reasons outlined in paragraphs 6.1 and 9.1 of the report.
|
|
804 |
Infrastructure Business Plan and Infrastructure Funding Statement 2024/25
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director of Community Development in which approval was sought for the Infrastructure Business Plan, including its strategic approach, assessment process for spending Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), and recommendation for CIL allocation. Approval was also sought for the 2024/25 North Yorkshire Council Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement for publication on the North Yorkshire Council website.
Councillor David Webster made a statement in relation to the previously committed funding of £330k for Bedale 3G pitch, which was proposed for removal from the current list of projects and reconsideration next year. Councillor Webster requested that the funding not be withdrawn, as to do so would damage confidence in the scheme and potentially cause delay in obtaining football foundation match funding. Evidence had already been provided of the need and deliverability of the scheme.
The Executive Member for Open to Business, Councillor Mark Crane, introduced the report and clarified that the intention was to reprofile spend and not withdraw support, as it was not clear that the money could be spent in the current year, and proposed that the recommendation be amended to keep the £300k ringfenced for the Bedale 3G pitch. Authority would be required to be delegated to the Corporate Director in consultation with the Executive Member to amend the business plan.
Resolved (unanimously)
1) that authority be delegated to the Corporate Director Community Development in consultation with the Executive Member for Open to Business to amend the Infrastructure Business Plan to include ringfencing of £330k for the Bedale 3G pitch
2) the North Yorkshire Infrastructure Business Plan inclusive of the CIL spending recommendations for 2025/26 and be agreed for publication on the website
3) the 2024/25 North Yorkshire Infrastructure Funding Statement and be agreed for publication on the Council website
Reasons for recommendations
The recommendations will:
· Provide clarity, transparency and consistency in the allocation and spending of CIL receipts. · Ensure CIL receipts are spent on infrastructure required to support development, in accordance with the CIL Regulations 2010 specifically as amended in September 2019 (‘the CIL Regulations’). · Ensure CIL serves its purpose of supporting the delivery of the infrastructure necessary to support development in North Yorkshire. · Meet statutory obligations for approval and publication of the Infrastructure Funding Statement.
Alternative options considered
An option considered was not to recommend any projects for funding. This approach was rejected because the identified projects are necessary to support the levels of growth set out in the relevant Local Plans and advancing the Council’s place-shaping ambitions. Without this investment, the ability to support sustainable development and meet strategic objectives would be significantly compromised.
In relation to the IFS there is no alternative, as failing to publish the document would mean that the Council would not meet the requirements of the Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) (England) (No.2) Regulations 2019.
|
|
805 |
North Yorkshire Capital Growth Priorities
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Community Development which provided an outline of North Yorkshire Capital Growth Priorities to feed into strategic work with the York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority (YNYCA) for approval.
The Executive Member for Open to Business, Councillor Mark Crane, introduced the report which described the investment framework being developed by the YNYCA and the requirement to prioritise key growth projects to ensure the council did not miss out on funding opportunities. Town investment plans were being developed for 32 towns across all parts of North Yorkshire which would feed into the pipeline of growth priorities in future years and assist in ensuring the council can secure inward investment from the Combined Authority.
Resolved (unanimously)
1) That the proposed methodology outlined above and the emerging place-based and thematic projects identified in Figure 2, and at Appendix A with a view to establishing a formal capital growth project pipeline for North Yorkshire be approved
2) That endorsement be given to work by officers to both develop any projects on the pipeline, and to utilise this pipeline in helping to shape conversations around future funding opportunities with the YNY Combined Authority and other private and public sector partners.
Reasons for recommendations
To establish a shared investment pipeline for North Yorkshire that can support targeted engagement and discussion with the Combined Authority and other partners.
Alternative options considered
In terms of developing a pipeline of place-based and thematic priorities, no other alternative approach was considered due to the need for NYC to be able to clearly articulate where action needs to be focused in the short to medium term.
|
|
806 |
Housing Revenue Account - Asset Management Strategy
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Community Development seeking approval for the Asset Management Strategy, which set out North Yorkshire Council’s approach to managing its housing assets and provided a framework for compliance, investment planning and service delivery until 2027.
The Executive Member for Culture, Arts and Housing, Councillor Simon Myers, presented the report and made the following key points
· On formation of the new council three separate Housing Revenue Accounts were inherited from predecessor stockholding authorities. Due to non-compliance with existing and new regulations introduced at the time of vesting the Council self-referred to the Regulator of Social Housing · A new Asset Management Strategy had been developed to provide a compliant approach across all housing stock covering safe and decent homes, energy efficiency, growth and regeneration, asset data, tenant engagement, and internal capacity. · By 2027 expected outcomes included 100% of stock condition surveys completed, EPC C ratings, improved tenant satisfaction, proactive rather than reactive maintenance and full integration of asset data into management systems. · The strategy had been reviewed by Overview and Scrutiny and would return for regular monitoring. Extensive engagement with the Tenants’ Panel has informed the strategy, reflecting a commitment to tenant-first culture and accountability.
In response to concerns raised in relation to void properties and tenants refusing access for upgrades, the Executive Member acknowledged these challenges but emphasised that disruption would be kept to a minimum and there were significant benefits in homes which were warm and affordable to heat.
Resolved (unanimously)
That the Asset Management Strategy as set out in Appendix A be approved.
Reasons for recommendation
Approval will give formal authority to implement the Strategy and deliver its objectives through established governance arrangements. Endorsing the Strategy will enable the Council to progress compliance programmes, plan long-term investment, and embed service transformation. It also ensures that improvement activity is coordinated, transparent, and aligned with statutory and regulatory requirements, while contributing to wider corporate priorities and the Housing Revenue Account Business Plan.
Alternative options considered
In developing the Asset Management Strategy, the Council considered several alternative approaches. These were assessed against their ability to deliver compliance, consistency, and long-term improvement across the housing portfolio.
Continuing with legacy systems and frameworks inherited from predecessor authorities was deemed unsustainable. This approach would have perpetuated inconsistencies in data quality, compliance assurance, and service delivery, and would not have addressed the concerns raised by the Regulator of Social Housing.
Delaying strategic development until after the completion of stock condition surveys was another option. However, this would have postponed necessary improvements in compliance, investment planning, and service delivery. The adopted approach enables immediate action while allowing survey data to refine and strengthen delivery over time.
The Strategy adopted reflects a balanced and proactive approach. It consolidates existing programmes and responsibilities into a single, coherent framework, while also introducing new systems and delivery models where needed. This enables the Council to respond to immediate regulatory and operational challenges and lays the foundation for long-term transformation and continuous improvement in housing asset management.
|
|
807 |
Howardian Hills and Nidderdale National Landscapes Management Plans
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Environment which provided an overview of the proposed Howardian Hills National Landscape and Nidderdale National Landscape Management Plans following a statutory consultation exercise, stakeholder engagement and overall review for approval and formal adoption by North Yorkshire Council.
The Executive Member for Managing our Environment, Councillor Richard Foster, reported that national landscapes were required by law to have management plans and the plans had been developed in conjunction with the Joint Advisory Committees for each National Landscape.
Resolved (unanimously)
1) That the draft 2025-2030 Howardian Hills Landscape Management Plan be for approved and adopted by the Council.
2) That the draft 2025-2030 Nidderdale National Landscape Management Plan be approved and adopted by the Council.
Reasons for recommendations
Both Management Plans provide an important mechanism for a wide range of partner organisations, including many North Yorkshire Council services, to work together to deliver environmental, rural community and access enhancements across both National Landscapes.
Alternative options considered
Undertaking the review of the Management Plans is a statutory requirement as described above. Therefore, there are no alternative options available for consideration and North Yorkshire Council must carry out the review.
|
|
808 |
Proposals for revised school organisation arrangements requested by several federated governing boards of primary schools in North Yorkshire
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Children and Young People’s Service which detailed the outcomes arising from public consultation exercises that have been undertaken by the council at the request of four federated governing boards about proposals to change their school organisation arrangements. It was recommended that Executive authorise the publication of statutory notices in respect of each of the proposals and schedule taking final decisions about the proposals on 17 March 2026. The four federations were: · BAWB (Bainbridge, Askrigg and West Burton) Federation · Reeth and Gunnerside Schools Federation · The Federation of Middleham (VA) & Spennithorne (VC) CE Primary Schools · The Synergy Schools Federation
The Executive Member for Education, Learning and Skills, Councillor Annabel Wilkinson, provided details of the consultations which had taken place and advised that the outcomes had been broadly supportive of each of the proposals.
Councillor Yvonne Peacock spoke in support of the proposals for Bainbridge, Askrigg and West Burton. She expressed disappointment at the proposed closure of West Burton Primary School, however overall the proposals would be of benefit to pupils.
Resolved (unanimously)
1) That the Executive give approval to publish statutory proposals and notices on 12 January 2026, jointly with the respective federated governing boards, for the following federated schools:
BAWB (Bainbridge, Askrigg and West Burton) Federation i) to close West Burton Church of England (Voluntary Controlled) Primary School from 31 March 2026. ii) to change the age range of Bainbridge Church of England (Voluntary Controlled) Primary and Nursery School to 3 to 7 years from 1 September 2026 iii) to change the age range of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled Primary School to 7 to 11 years from 1 September 2026.
Reeth and Gunnerside Schools Federation iv) to change the age range of Reeth Community Primary School to 3 to 7 years from 1 September 2026. v) to change the age range of Gunnerside Methodist (Voluntary Controlled) Primary School to 7 to 11 years from 1 September 2026.
The Federation of Middleham (VA) & Spennithorne (VC) CE Primary Schools vi) to change the age range of Spennithorne Church of England Primary School to 4 to 7 years from 1 September 2026. vii) to change the age range of Middleham Church of England (Voluntary) Aided Primary School to 7 to 11 years from 1 September 2026. viii) to change the category of Spennithorne Church of England School to Voluntary Aided from 1 September 2026.
The Synergy Schools Federation ix) to discontinue Leeming and Londonderry Community Primary School from 13 April 2026 x) to enlarge Aiskew, Leeming Bar Church of England Primary School onto an additional site using the Leeming and Londonderry school site from 13 April 2026.
2) That the Executive schedule taking a final decision on these proposals on 17 March 2026.
3) That subject to the final approval of the proposals in paragraph 19.1 above, the following home to school travel discretionary arrangements be approved:
i) That the Council provides discretionary travel for children, already assessed as eligible for travel and on roll at schools on 1 September 2026, within the BAWB (Bainbridge, Askrigg and West Burton) Federation, Reeth and Gunnerside Schools Federation and The Federation of Middleham (VA) & Spennithorne (VC) CE schools for the duration of their education at the schools within the federation, subject to there being no change in their circumstances.
ii) That the Council approves through its discretion a ‘nearest gate in the federation’ policy for home school transport to Reeth and Gunnerside schools, which would be conditional upon the Reeth and Gunnerside Schools Federation continuing to provide support with inter-school transport where that is required.
Reasons for recommendations
To ensure that the school organisation arrangements operated by the above federated governing boards
1. Are compliant with the legislation and guidance that govern the arrangements for school admissions and registration, and:
2. Provide a sustainable basis for the continued provision of high quality education within their local communities.
Alternative options considered
The alternative proposals that have been appraised in depth by the federated governing boards are outlined in the report attached as Appendix 1.
Having undertaken their appraisals of alternative options, federated governing boards informed their parents and communities about their proposals for the future organisational arrangements of each school.
|
|
809 |
Primary Exclusion and Day 6 Provision
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Children and Young People’s Service providing information gained through consultation and seeking approval to proceed with proposals to lower the age range to 5-16 of the three maintained Pupil Referral Units in North Yorkshire for excluded primary pupils and support reintegration.
The Executive Member for Education, Learning and Skills, Councillor Annabel Wilkinson, reported a significant rise in permanent exclusions of primary-age pupils from five children in 2021-22 to 25 children in 2024-25. Consultation had taken place with parents, carers, education professionals and the wider community.
Members expressed concern at the rise in numbers and the need for early interventions was highlighted. The Head of SEND confirmed that the proposal was a practical solution that also supported prevention and inclusion in mainstream settings.
Resolved (unanimously)
That the age range of Sunbeck PRU (Northallerton), Craven PRU (Skipton) and The Rubicon Centre (Selby) be lowered to 5-16 at a suitable date aligned to implementation plans.
Reasons for recommendation
The recommendation is based upon the rising demand across the county for this type of provision, the need for the council to have a long-term sustainable arrangement in place for primary aged children excluded from school and the legal implications should the council not have an arrangement in places that satisfies the duties placed upon it.
|
|
810 |
North Yorkshire Council Enforcement Strategy
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director of Environment seeking approval for the adoption of a single Enforcement Policy for North Yorkshire Council. The policy set out a clear, consistent, and transparent framework for how the Council would undertake enforcement activities across its services. It aimed to ensure that enforcement was carried out in a fair, proportionate, and effective manner, supporting compliance, protecting public interests, and promoting community confidence in how the Council delivered its regulatory functions.
Resolved
That the proposed North Yorkshire Council Enforcement Policy is adopted (Appendix A).
Reasons for recommendations
The new North Yorkshire Council Enforcement Policy sets out a clear, consistent, and transparent framework for how the Council will undertake enforcement activities across its services. It aims to ensure that enforcement is carried out in a fair, proportionate, and effective manner, supporting compliance, protecting public interests, and promoting community confidence in regulatory services.
The proposed policy is in accord with the principles of the Regulators’ Code and associated legal requirements and the furtherance of good practice in the delivery of our regulatory responsibilities.
Alternative options considered
Continued reliance upon predecessor enforcement policies, although permitted under local government reorganisation transitional arrangements, is not a suitable longer-term position and exposes the Council, and regulatory officers, to risk of legal challenge and obstacle to successful delivery of regulatory functions. Therefore, in essence, bringing forward a harmonised approach is the only viable option.
|
|
811 |
Eastfield: Former Overdale School Site and Middle Deepdale Capital Receipts Funding
Considered – A report of the Assistant Chief Executive Local Engagement providing an update on the historical agreement between Keepmoat developers and former Scarborough Borough Council, including the programme of capital receipts and seeking direction on the funding that remains unallocated.
The Executive Member for Corporate Services, Councillor Heather Phillips, introduced the report which sought approval for development of a community investment plan in relation to £3.2 million of unallocated funding intended for regeneration activity in Eastfield. Mr Jim Bullock of Phoenix Community Park CIO made a statement to which Councillor Heather Phillips responded, as detailed at Minute 802.
Councillor Tom Seston, the Division Member for Eastfield, welcomed the opportunity the funding provided for Eastfield and requested that the Council look at match funding and appointing a project manager for the scheme. The Executive Member responded that the council was already providing support and emphasised the need to ensure long term sustainability of the scheme.
The Corporate Director of Finance advised that the council would be sympathetic to looking at seed funding if it would help with progress, however it was hoped that the project would remain community-led. It was confirmed that the scheme would satisfy match funding contribution requirements
Resolved (unanimously)
1) Approval be given to up to a 15-month period for the Eastfield community to develop and submit a coordinated investment plan (including robust business cases) as part of the TIP development process and instruct NYC Officers to support any community driven arrangements and plan development as required. This includes the development of appropriate criteria against which such business cases will be assessed and awarded, to ensure fairness, transparency and the best use of the remaining capital receipts.
2) The fallback clause allowing NYC to reallocate funds if no plan materialises by March 2027 be noted.
Reasons for recommendations
There is £3.2 million residual capital receipts funding currently unallocated; the recommendation aligns with the spirit of the original agreement set out between former Scarborough Borough Council and Keepmoat Homes, and NYC’s commitment to local engagement and empowerment outlined in the TIP development process.
Alternative options considered
There are no alternative options for consideration. In keeping with the spirit of the original agreement set out by former SBC and Keepmoat Homes, and the high levels of community expectation in relation to this funding, it is determined that the proposals set out in this report is the only option available.
|
|
812 |
Variation of Restrictive Covenant – Land at Sherburn in Elmet
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Resources requesting approval for variation of a restrictive covenant and overage provision which was applied to land at Sherburn in Elmet when it was sold by the Council. Under the terms of the restrictive covenant should the land be used for non-agricultural development an additional capital receipt would be due to the Council and exempt Appendix 1 set out a summary of the financial implications of the variation.
(Minute dealt with in exempt session)
(Councillor Mark Crane declared an interest in the item on that basis that he was a Member of the Selby and Ainsty Area planning Committee and left the meeting during consideration of the item)
Resolved
That the variation of restrictive covenant proceeds on terms to be agreed by the Corporate Director (Resources) in consultation with the Executive Member for Finance and Resources.
Reasons for recommendation
This variation will generate a capital receipt for the Council which will enable re-investment into other key areas of the council’s priorities via the Capital Programme.
Alternative options considered
No other options are currently available in relation to this property as NYC is not the property owner and the interest the Council has in the site is limited.
|
|
813 |
Acquisition of properties in various localities for use as affordable homes to go into the Housing Revenue Account
Considered – A report of the Corporate Director Community Development in which approval was sought for the acquisition of 10 new build properties at two separate locations in Ripon and Bedale. The properties would be acquired for both shared ownership and social rented accommodation and would be taken into the Housing Revenue Account (HRA). The total cost of purchasing the ten homes amounted to £2,571,200 including all associated on-costs and the purchase contributed to the Council’s target of adding 500 new homes into the HRA.
(Minute dealt with in exempt session)
Resolved
That Executive approves the acquisition of 10 newbuild homes, with 4 newbuild properties in Ripon, all 4 homes for use as shared ownership and 6 newbuild homes in Bedale, 1 of which are for Shared Ownership and the remaining 5 for social rent. All homes will be taken into the HRA, on terms to be agreed in accordance with this report and as agreed by the Corporate Director for Resources.
Reasons for recommendations
The reason for the recommendation is to provide 10 properties of new affordable housing in Ripon and Bedale, which will meet the requirements of the HRA Business Plan for the development of a minimum of 500 new Council homes across North Yorkshire.
Alternative options considered
The acquisition of “off the shelf” properties from developers forms an important part of the Councils plans for both delivering the HRA Business Plan to provide 500 new Council homes. The acquisition of these properties forms quick wins for the Council, and there were no other viable options for acquisition of new properties available to the Council at the present time.
|
|
814 |
Appointments to Committees and Outside Bodies
Considered – A report of the Assistant Chief Executive Legal and Democratic Services outlining vacancies on Groundwork Yorkshire LTD and the Groundwork North Yorkshire LTD following the recent resignation of one of the current nominated representatives.
Resolved
That the appointments be considered by the Scarborough and Whitby Area Committee and the Selby and Ainsty Area Committee respectively.
|
|
815 |
Forward Plan
Considered – The Forward Plan for the period 5 December 2025 to 31 December 2026 was presented.
Resolved
That the Forward Plan be noted.
|
|
816 |
Date of Next Meeting - 6 January 2026
|
The meeting concluded at 12.22 pm.